The Bagman

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Station Appeal

Human Rights Charter

09.03.2020 by bagman //

I don’t have to be be smarter  than a builders labourer or as dumb as a sovereign soldier to believe that the human rights charter ( 1948)  espoused mainly by cranks getting their  civil rights advice from extreme right wing websites originating from America or by the Pentecostal churches, are totally wrong. Misguided is a not a word that should apply to the arrogant ignorance of these fools .

I have read the Human Rights Charter myself as opposed to most people  who just flick it at you from a extremely dubious fictitious site or have to read a prepared letter in a plastic cover.

My observations even reading between the lines and chasing down rabbit holes to find a smidgeon of a conspiracy theory, I came up as empty headed as a flat earth conspirator.

Where in the charter, whether you want to quote the 1948 or 2016 version could I find a section that allows people to break the law , exactly the opposite!

What section of the charter says that in a major health crises, such as a pandemic it gives people the right to subject others to a deadly virus that has killed million worldwide?

I have looked for the specific section of the act that says people have the right to refuse laws instigated by the chief health officer imposed for the protection of all. Cant find it!

It is in the charter that no person shall have the right to subject fellow citizens to danger,  and many other protections  for Australians .

I am medically compromised. Where are my rights when confronted by some buffoon refusing to wear a mask or social distance? Well, they  are contained in the human rights act which protects me from irresponsibility of other law breakers subjecting me to harm.

The  Human Rights Act does not permit  people to defy the laws imposed by the Chief Medical officer, laws instituted for the health and safety of all Australians.

Once again could someone point to the the relevant section of the act that says people can undemocratically choose to defy laws passed in Parliament simply for their own greedy sake

If laws are oppressive or draconian, people have a duty to resist those laws but, in doing so, you don’t quote the human rights charter simply because those oppressive laws would not and are not contained there .

Its a human rights charter, not an oppressive or draconian charter. If people want to change the law, change the government. Good luck with that one

 

Categories // Shame Tags // covid, Human Rights Charter, masks

Share
|







Comments

  1. Ann Taylor says

    September 4, 2020 at 5:25 am

    I am sure that a lot of people quoting it don’t have a bloody clue.

admin


Share |

Want to Rate your Boss?

Recent

  • Human Rights Charter
  • Workers Rights our Citizens Rights
  • Wannabe Mayor,Brian Sanaghan

Tags

3CR ACTU advice ALP andrew landeryou Bill Shorten brimbank catholic church celebrity chefs Channel 31 covid darebin council David Feeney Diana Asmar diane asmar fat boys gatto Geoffrey Edelsten gordon ramsay grech health services union HSU jeannie little jeff jackson Kate Carnell kathy jackson lobby groups mark arbib masks morning star boutique hotel morning star boys home nostrilanus Pell popular public transport racism religion ripped off workers royal wedding rudd Spain Stephen Conroy students swine flu unions

Did the Labor party dodge the bullet

It seems that the Australian Labor Party - as opposed to the Labour movement - has avoided an extreme shift to the right with the expose’ … [Read More...]

Contact

Got a story to tell? Are you a ripped-off worker? Tell me about it .. Leave me a message on Facebook

Human Rights Charter

I don’t have to be be smarter  than a builders labourer or as dumb as a sovereign soldier to believe that the human rights charter ( 1948)  espoused mainly by cranks getting their  civil … [Read More...]

Copyright © 2021 · Modern Studio Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in