The Bagman

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Search
  • Contact

Human Rights Charter

09.03.2020 by bagman //

I don’t have to be be smarter  than a builders labourer or as dumb as a sovereign soldier to believe that the human rights charter ( 1948)  espoused mainly by cranks getting their  civil rights advice from extreme right wing websites originating from America or by the Pentecostal churches, are totally wrong. Misguided is a not a word that should apply to the arrogant ignorance of these fools .

I have read the Human Rights Charter myself as opposed to most people  who just flick it at you from a extremely dubious fictitious site or have to read a prepared letter in a plastic cover.

My observations even reading between the lines and chasing down rabbit holes to find a smidgeon of a conspiracy theory, I came up as empty headed as a flat earth conspirator.

Where in the charter, whether you want to quote the 1948 or 2016 version could I find a section that allows people to break the law , exactly the opposite!

What section of the charter says that in a major health crises, such as a pandemic it gives people the right to subject others to a deadly virus that has killed million worldwide?

I have looked for the specific section of the act that says people have the right to refuse laws instigated by the chief health officer imposed for the protection of all. Cant find it!

It is in the charter that no person shall have the right to subject fellow citizens to danger,  and many other protections  for Australians .

I am medically compromised. Where are my rights when confronted by some buffoon refusing to wear a mask or social distance? Well, they  are contained in the human rights act which protects me from irresponsibility of other law breakers subjecting me to harm.

The  Human Rights Act does not permit  people to defy the laws imposed by the Chief Medical officer, laws instituted for the health and safety of all Australians.

Once again could someone point to the the relevant section of the act that says people can undemocratically choose to defy laws passed in Parliament simply for their own greedy sake

If laws are oppressive or draconian, people have a duty to resist those laws but, in doing so, you don’t quote the human rights charter simply because those oppressive laws would not and are not contained there .

Its a human rights charter, not an oppressive or draconian charter. If people want to change the law, change the government. Good luck with that one

 

Categories // Shame Tags // covid, Human Rights Charter, masks

Share
|







Comments

  1. Ann Taylor says

    September 4, 2020 at 5:25 am

    I am sure that a lot of people quoting it don’t have a bloody clue.

admin

Podcasts

Want to Rate your Boss?

Recent

  • Uncertain
  • If you want a friend in politics- buy a dog
  • Cry Freedom

Tags

3CR Adam Somyruk advice ALP andrew landeryou Bill Shorten Birthing Tree branch stacking brian sanaghan brimbank bump me into parliament celebrity chefs cesar melhem Channel 31 climate change covid diana asmar fat boys gatto gordon ramsay grech health services union Human Rights Charter IBAC jeff jackson Kate Carnell kathy jackson kimberly kitching lobby groups Marlene Kairouz masks morning star boys home morrison Pell popular post-covid public transport racism ripped off workers Royal Commission seniors shop assistants Spain swine flu Talbot

Podcasts

Find the archive of radio … read more

Contact

Got a story to tell? Are you a ripped-off worker? Tell me about it

Creative Commons

The Bagman website is … read more

Copyright © 2022 · Modern Studio Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in